Helicosphaera

Description

  • Citation: 
    Genus Helicosphaera Kamptner, 1954

    Description: Coccoliths with helical flange, sub-groups can be recognised based on presence/absence of a disjunct bar, bar orientation, flange shape, etc. (see e.g. Theodoridis 1984, Perch-Nielsen 1985b, Aubry 1990, Young 1998).

    Type: Helicosphaera carteri

    Synonym: Helicopontosphaera

    Subdivision: The large number of described species have been variously subdivided into sub-groups by different workers (e.g. Aubry 1990, Theodoridis 1984). The subdivision followed here is essentially based on Young (1998). The recta group appears to be a clearly separate lineage from the other Helicosphaera species, but the phylogenetic unity of the walbersdorfensis and ampliaperta groups is less certain.

    paleocarteri_Theod84.jpgintermedia_Theod84.jpg Helicosphaera carteri group - typical forms NPX-NN21
    ampliap.jpgmediterranea_Theod84.jpg Helicosphaera ampliaperta group - with open central area, sometime spanned by narrow bar NP21-NN4
    perch-nielseniae_Theod84.jpgorientalis_Theod84.jpg Helicosphaera recta group - with flange abruptly terminated and inversely-oriented pores/bar NP23-NN11
    walbersdorf_Theod84.jpgstalis_stalis_Theod84.jpg Helicosphaera walbersdorfensis group - small, with flange extending unusually far round coccolith, normally-oriented oblique pores NN2-NN11

    Drawings - the drawings used in the table above are from Theodoridis (1984)

  • Citation: 
    H. carteri group of Young (1998)

    These are medium to large species (typically 7-11 microns) with flanges that end in distinct wings. They are the most common helicoliths in most samples, but vary markedly through the Neogene. Forms with disjunct (optically discontinuous) bars (H. euphratis & H. intermedia) dominate in the Early Miocene but are replaced progressively by forms with closed central areas or conjunct bars. The blankets on these are initially rather chaotic (H. granulata) but forms with well ordered blankets with two in-line pores (H. carteri) become more common through the Late Miocene. In the Pliocene, forms with large and/or oblique pores (H. sellii and H. wallichii) become common.

    Drawing Outline description Range
    euphratis_Theod84.jpg H. euphratis - broad disjunct bar NN1-3
    intermedia_Theod84.jpg H. intermedia - narrow disjunct bar
    NN1-11
    sketch Hgranul H. granulata - granular central area, without real pores
    NN1-10
    paleocarteri_Theod84.jpg H. carteri - pores inline
    NN1-21
    wallichii_Theod84.jpg H. wallichii - pores oblique
    NN11(?)-21
    sketch Hsell H. sellii - pores large
    NN12-19
    inversa_Theod84.jpg H. inversa - pores separated by inversely oriented bar (points toward flange termination) NN19-20
    sketch Hpavim H. pavimentum - small, narrow flange, inline pores NN19-21

Images

  • distal view (modern)
  • proximal view of coccolith (modern)
  • H. carteri coccosphere (modern)
  • H. wallichii coccosphere (modern)
  • H. wallichii coccosphere (modern)
  • H. wallichii proximal (modern)
Scratchpads developed and conceived by: Vince Smith, Simon Rycroft & Dave Roberts