Umbilicosphaera

Description

  • Citation: 
    Umbilicosphaera Lohmann 1902

    Description: Coccoliths circular or elliptical, with Calcidiscus structure but central area open, distal shield elements usually show complex kinked sutures. Proximal shield may be monocyclic (e.g. U. sibogae, U. rotula) or bicyclic (e.g. U. foliosa, U. hulburtiana) and may be larger or smaller than the distal shield.

    Species:

    images species characteristics
    5-1sibogae.JPG216-07a.jpg

    U. sibogae

    Pliocene- Recent

    circular, medium sized central opening, proximal shield larger than distal
    5-4sibogae_foliosa.JPGUmbilicosphaeraD.JPGUmbilicosphaeraE.JPG

    U. foliosa

    Pliocene- Recent

    circular, small central opening, distal shield large than proximal, proximal shield bicyclic.
    5-6jafari.JPGUjaf201 (471-0) 22dNN14-15.JPG

    U. jafari

    Miocene-Pliocene

    circular, small with small central opening, shields similar in size
    5-10rotula.JPGUrot203-77 (472-0-07)NN14-15.JPGUrot201 (471-0) 19NN14-15.JPG

    U. rotula

    Miocene-Pliocene

    circular, with large central opening, shields similar in size
    5-5hulburtiana.JPG

    U. hulburtiana

    Pliocene- Recent

     

    NB The modern species U. sibogae, U. foliosa and U. hulburtiana are all clearly recognisable at least in Late Pleistocene sediements and they almost certainly evolved from the Miocene species U. jafari and U. rotula. However, the detailed evolutionary history has not been studied.

    Remarks: The separation of Calcidiscus and Umbilicosphaera is essentially based on width of central opening, which is not a very satisfactory criterion, but so far molecular genetic data has supported separation of the extant species assigned to these genera (Saez et al. 2003). The larger size of the central opening also means that the proto-coccolith ring is relatively wide in Umbilicosphaera and so that the numbers of elements for a given coccolith size is higher in Umbilicosphaera and so they are narrower and less clearly visible in LM. In LM the individual elements are usually clearly visible in Calcidiscus species, especially in phase contrast illumination, whilst they are obscure in Umbilicosphaera. Umbilicosphaera species usually also show complex kinking of sutures in the distal shield, but this can occur in Calcidiscus (more complex in Umbilicosphaera).

    Type species: U. mirabilis Lohmann 1902 (j. syn. of U. sibogae).

    Synonym: Geminilithella Backman, 1980 - the type species U. rotula falls well within the range of variation shown by modern Umbilicosphaera species.

     

  • coronocyclus_nitescens.jpg
    Citation: 
    Coronocyclus nitescens (Kamptner, 1963) Bramlette and Wilcoxon, 1967 [Umbilicosphaera]

    Description: Ring-shaped coccoliths with open central-area. No clear shield development, spines on distal side. Strongly birefringent.

    Remarks:

    Range: Palaeogene to NN6.

    5-13nitescens.JPG 5-12nitescens.JPG 5-11nitescens.JPG 5-14nitescens_elliptical.JPG 5-15nitescens_elliptical.JPG
    Coronocyclus nitescens Coronocylus nitescens - side view      
    Cornit267-27NN2.JPG Cornit267-24NN2.JPG Cornit265-15NN5.JPG Cornit265-25NN5.JPG Cornit267-16NN2.JPG

     

     

    Synonyms:

    • Coronocyclus serratus Hay, Mohler and Wade, 1966

    Variant: Elliptical forms, with narrow rims, occur in NN5-6.

Images

  • 216-07a.jpg
  • 5-1sibogae.JPG
  • 5-2sibogae.JPG
  • 5-4sibogae_foliosa.JPG
  • 5-3sibogae_foliosa.JPG
  • 5-5hulburtiana.JPG
Scratchpads developed and conceived by: Vince Smith, Simon Rycroft & Dave Roberts