Braarudosphaeraceae

Citation: 
Family BRAARUDOSPHAERACEAE Deflandre 1947

Basic morphology: Cell is typically non-motile and entirely enclosed in an exotheca of twelve plates each with five-fold symmetry (pentaliths). Cells have frequently been isolated but have never grown in culture, they contain visible chloroplasts, so are not cysts or protozoa (Lefort 1972, pers. comms. Green, Probert, Hagino). Lefort (1972) observed, and illustrated, rare specimens of B. magnei with two apically placed, sub-equal flagella.

B bigelowii 209-28 6-30bigelowii.JPG

Affinities: Braarudosphaera was long considered a group of highly uncertain affinities and possibly dinoflagellates, but recent molecular genetic data (Takano et al. 2006) has shown that they occupy a basal position within the coccolithophore clade, and so are definitely haptophytes and probably derived in some way from coccolithophores.

Pentalith morphology: Pentaliths consist of five segments, each of which behaves as a discrete crystal-unit with c-axis parallel to edge of the pentalith. A lamellar substructure to the segments is consistently present.

Diversity: Only two extant species have been described and only one of these, B. bigelowii, is well-established, but the family has a geological record back to the Early Cretaceous including several genera and many species (e.g. Perch-Nielsen 1985a,b, Aubry 1989, Bown 2005). These include forms with heavily ornamented pentaliths and pentaliths with concave sides. They sometimes occur in enormous abundance in sediments suggesting that Braarudosphaera can form massive blooms (see Peleo-Alampay et al. 1999). At present day, Braarudosphaera occurs sporadically in shelf environments, usually under conditions of lowered salinity.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
edit logoScratchpads logoCreative Commons Licensedrupal logo
Scratchpads developed and conceived by: Vince Smith, Simon Rycroft & Dave Roberts